Re: BSDConfig
"Christian Edward Gruber" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.gnustep.applications |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <048601c0405b$bce5c3f0$0200910a@israil> |
Folks... NeXTSTEP had TONS! of splashscreens, and I hate to tell you,but most usability gurus recommend them as indicators of progress in load-up. Specifically progress indicators reduce user dissatisfaction, as they give an indicator of user time investment. Sorry to blow any anti-M$ sentiment, but if this is indeed an "evil", it's not one that MS invented. And I disagree that it is an evil at all. Now modal splashscreens which prevent you from changing window focus... they _are_ evil... ;) And besides, splash screens are a great place to drop in amusements, as the Lighthouse and other folks often used to do. regards, christian. ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 5:03 PM Subject: RE: BSDConfig > i agree completely on all points, being a near-rabid-anti-M$-pursist > myself...that's why i put in the e-snicker after mentioning the SplashConfig > object. it was just a toy hack to swap out the splash.bmp file & enable it > at boot...it'll only take a few more lines of code to add a checkbox & a > textfield (for the image path) in whatever gui pane i choose to put it > in...if i put it in. >