Re: Libusbk for Window 10 signing
Børge Strand-Bergesen <[email protected]> Mon, 10 Aug 2015 15:07:12 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.libusb.devel.windows |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAE9Na6GcEi4eUnRHUGtOYivt+2et_ey366Lm5JWESMf11hbVnQ@mail.gmail.com> |
OK. I just need to know how long the existing libusbK based driver can be expected to function and be installed on Win10. Is this the June-2016 date you were talking about? There must be quite a few libusbK based programs out there looking for an future-proof path forward. Anybody care to share their experience with me? Thanks, Borge On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Xiaofan Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Børge Strand-Bergesen > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Xiaofan, >> >> I'm part of the open source Audio Widget project and the owner of one >> commercial hardware implementation of it. >> >> We have a Windows driver based on libusbK (.sys and .dll), and I'd >> like it to continue working for still some time. As an embedded >> hardware guy I don't personally have the skill to port the driver to >> another library. >> >> Does this mean the existing built driver will not install / eventually >> stop working / work forever on Win10? Which one applies to a >> libusbk.dll based driver built in the future? It's important that I >> warn existing users about any driver updates. >> >> The ideal would of course be that the existing driver installs forever >> on all of Win7/8/10, but bar that, I hope a new build can still >> install on all three. >> >> If this is a matter of funding a certificate for libusbK, let me know. >> > > We think the future of generic Windows driver is WinUSB driver. > WinUSB already works with isochronous transfer since Windows 8.1. > Ref: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/dn376866(v=vs.85).aspx > > So probably some capable people can step in and add WinUSB > support to libusbK.dll for the isochronous transfer function if you > still want to use libusbK API (libusbk.dll). > > Another possibility is to look at usbdk which will be better supported > since it is from Redhat. > Ref: http://sourceforge.net/p/libusb/mailman/message/34083838/ > > > -- > Xiaofan > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Libusb-win32-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusb-win32-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Libusb-win32-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusb-win32-devel