Re: Libusbk for Window 10 signing

Børge Strand-Bergesen <[email protected]> Mon, 10 Aug 2015 15:07:12 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.libusb.devel.windows
Message-ID <CAE9Na6GcEi4eUnRHUGtOYivt+2et_ey366Lm5JWESMf11hbVnQ@mail.gmail.com>
OK. I just need to know how long the existing libusbK based driver can
be expected to function and be installed on Win10. Is this the
June-2016 date you were talking about?

There must be quite a few libusbK based programs out there looking for
an future-proof path forward. Anybody care to share their experience
with me?

Thanks,
Borge


On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Xiaofan Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Børge Strand-Bergesen
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Xiaofan,
>>
>> I'm part of the open source Audio Widget project and the owner of one
>> commercial hardware implementation of it.
>>
>> We have a Windows driver based on libusbK (.sys and .dll), and I'd
>> like it to continue working for still some time. As an embedded
>> hardware guy I don't personally have the skill to port the driver to
>> another library.
>>
>> Does this mean the existing built driver will not install / eventually
>> stop working / work forever on Win10? Which one applies to a
>> libusbk.dll based driver built in the future? It's important that I
>> warn existing users about any driver updates.
>>
>> The ideal would of course be that the existing driver installs forever
>> on all of Win7/8/10, but bar that, I hope a new build can still
>> install on all three.
>>
>> If this is a matter of funding a certificate for libusbK, let me know.
>>
>
> We think the future of generic Windows driver is WinUSB driver.
> WinUSB already works with isochronous transfer since Windows 8.1.
> Ref: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/dn376866(v=vs.85).aspx
>
> So probably some capable people can step in and add WinUSB
> support to libusbK.dll for the isochronous transfer function if you
> still want to use libusbK API (libusbk.dll).
>
> Another possibility is to look at usbdk which will be better supported
> since it is from Redhat.
> Ref: http://sourceforge.net/p/libusb/mailman/message/34083838/
>
>
> --
> Xiaofan
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Libusb-win32-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusb-win32-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Libusb-win32-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusb-win32-devel