Alternatives for libusbK.dll and libusbK.sys

Just wondering how many users are using the libusbK API (libusbK.dll)?
How many are using the libusbK driver (libusbk.sys)?

libusbK API is Windows only and it supports libusbk.sys, libusb0.sys
and WinUSB. It is quite unique. The only alternative I can think of is
probably the original WinUSB API. Travis mentioned before he wanted
to add the WinUSB ISO support in libusbK.dll but I am not so sure when
that will happen.

Of course users can switch to libusb-1.0 API as well.

As for libusbk.sys, I think the usage is probably pretty low since WinUSB
will be a better alternative.



-- 
Xiaofan


On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Travis <[email protected]> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> LibusbK is already signed with a DigiCert High Assurance EV Root CA.
>
> At some point, I would like to add the WinUSB ISO support to the libusbK
> library and let it become our "primary" driver.  There is little
> advantage to using libusbK.sys compares to the newer WinUsb.sys with ISO
> support.
>
> That said, nothing is going to stop working.  Even if we support WinUSB
> ISO, we will not throw libusbK.sys away.  I would expect most all users
> to WANT to transition to the winusb driver.  There are some big
> advantage because it is essentially a built-in windows driver for custom
> usb devices.  You can even add things to you USB descriptor which
> identifies it as a "winusb" device and eliminate the need for a driver
> installer all-together.
>
> Regards,
> Travis
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140