Re: ACR122U response frames contain wrong sequence numbers

On 08/19/2013 06:28 PM, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:

>> yes, I've read negative reviews of this device. But it's cheap, and more
>> or less does its job. The point of my post is (a) could somebody who has
>> such device check and either confirm or disprove my finding, and (b) if
>> it's a universal problem with this model, will you accept a patch with a
>> workaround (e.g as a run-time option).
> 
> I have 2 different ACR 122U in my list:
> - ACS ACR122U http://pcsclite.alioth.debian.org/ccid/shouldwork.html#0x072F0x90CC
> - ACS ACR122U PICC Interface
> http://pcsclite.alioth.debian.org/ccid/unsupported.html#0x072F0x2200
> 
> Can you follow http://pcsclite.alioth.debian.org/ccid.html#CCID_compliant ?

I sent the data to you directly.

I am off for two weeks vacation tomorrow; when I return I intend to continue
working on the yubico library. I made libccid work for me by just commenting out
the sequence check, but I can make a more "proper" workaround and send the patch
here.

Eugene

_______________________________________________
Muscle mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.musclecard.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle_lists.musclecard.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEVAwUBUhJbsjy8vXtX5W5FAQI7rwgAjiq2JHrdsaIxjxl01DCy5zgp2RT5mUX3
n5taKggrYGuYNxzDJUdXbGtq9cs2qa+P304wiW9LmiPZmyVpCHOIfrgcQKkYslp5
2NBRWBL73s2oI7r0zxxj4PsoMyjFiDqsJQf6ek/oEfkYMKbW47cgcMisO08MzD7I
Guavjr4ZHDKb2Uz5YknXtFevrNGaBLJmlTdNOaN/JQnw238kBRNWwzSFLQaWy5oc
EAzYUREOGYxUD6uovmEIDbQRnwHKaiX8lEhnVA4USLoBi88VIOCEVFnUsvtRv2ST
CM1PbWnQ8hs18cIHC0wUiHUT883uhaclczYUEtVqz8xrCw1Zzy1+rw==
=ha7+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----