Re: [PATCH] Auto-generated files for commit e6ce6f1430eee503a388cf1fc7fe6634de09fb0f

Hi Eshan,

Typically, you do not run autotools for newllib patches.  I or Corinne will
do that for you so if this patch has not changed from the one you submitted
without autoconf files, then I'll just regenerate the files for you and
amend the patch.

--- Jeff J.

On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 5:28 AM Sebastian Huber <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On 09/06/2020 10:56, Eshan Dhawan wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 10:27 AM Sebastian Huber
> > <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >     On 08/06/2020 08:06, Eshan Dhawan wrote:
> >
> >     >>> On 08-Jun-2020, at 10:40 AM, Sebastian
> >     Huber<[email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >     >>>
> >     >>> On 07/06/2020 19:42, Eshan dhawan wrote:
> >     >>>
> >     >>> diff --git a/newlib/configure b/newlib/configure
> >     >>> index d6c3372d8..4e0125101 100755
> >     >>> --- a/newlib/configure
> >     >>> +++ b/newlib/configure
> >     >>> @@ -1,11 +1,9 @@
> >     >>> #! /bin/sh
> >     >>> # Guess values for system-dependent variables and create
> >     Makefiles.
> >     >>> -# Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.68 for newlib 3.3.0.
> >     >>> +# Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.69 for newlib 3.3.0.
> >     >>> #
> >     >> If you use the wrong Autoconf/Automake versions to regenerate
> >     the files, then the universe may collapse.
> >     > I have tested the patches and it works completely fine with
> >     these versions as well.
> >
> >     With how many Newlib targets and host systems have you tested this
> >     change? Are you really confident enough to change the top-level
> >     configure file of Newlib through an unrelated side-effect of a
> >     powerpc
> >     fenv support patch?
> >
> >     Please regenerate the files with the right Automake/Autoconf versions
> >     and reduce the impact of your patch.
> >
> > Ok, I will regenerate the patch.
> > Could you please tell me the correct versions to be used,
> I don't know this for sure, but I guess it is Autoconf 2.68 if you look
> a couple of lines above.
>
>