Re: [PATCH 1/2] Improve lgammaf range for very small cases

Corinna Vinschen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.newlib
Message-ID <YgUn/[email protected]>
Hi Andoni,

On Feb  9 17:28, Andoni Arregi wrote:
> The original cut for small arguments at |x|<2**-70 (copied from the
> double version) produces that when computing nadj we get a subnormal
> number for t*x and thus, the division of pi/subnormal will be INF and
> the logarithm of it too, which is wrong as a result for lgammaf in this
> range.
> The proposed new limit seems to be safe and has been tested to
> produce accurate results.
> (Courtesy of Andreas Jung, ESA)
> ---
>  newlib/libm/math/erf_lgamma.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/newlib/libm/math/erf_lgamma.c
> b/newlib/libm/math/erf_lgamma.c

This is broken.  It should be on one line, so apparently your
mailer broke it via autowrapping lines.

> index f88f63092..84d02159b 100644
> --- a/newlib/libm/math/erf_lgamma.c
> +++ b/newlib/libm/math/erf_lgamma.c
> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static float zero=  0.0000000000e+00;
>  	       *signgamp = -1;
>  	   return one/(x-x);
>  	}
> -	if(ix<0x1c800000) {	/* |x|<2**-70, return -log(|x|) */
> +	if(ix<0x30800000) {	/* |x|<2**-30, return -log(|x|) */
>  	   if(hx<0) {
>  	       *signgamp = -1;
>  	       return -__ieee754_logf(-x);
> -- 
> 2.35.1

But even if I fix this manually, your patch doesn't apply, neither with
`git am', nor with `patch -p1'.  I have to admit that I don't understand
why...

Another question, would you mind to send patch series with a cover letter,
please?


Thanks,
Corinna
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.