Re: [PATCH] Fix expf overflow limit
Corinna Vinschen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.newlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Feb 9 14:52, Andoni Arregi wrote: > Correct the overflow limit in the variable o_threshold to be consistent > with the FLT_UWORD_LOG_MAX variable used by the internal implementation > of the expf algorithm itself. > The u_threshold variable has also been modified to be written in the > same format. > > Note that this fix improves the situation but does not completely > correct the inconsistencies regarding the overflow and underflow limits > between the expf wrapper (wf_exp.c) and the expf algorithm itself > (ef_exp.c). > > Currently these limits are different for the > _FLT_LARGEST_EXPONENT_IS_NORMAL and _FLT_NO_DENORMALS cases as well as > for the case where __OBSOLETE_MATH is not defined (only for the > underflow limit in this case). > --- > newlib/libm/math/wf_exp.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/newlib/libm/math/wf_exp.c b/newlib/libm/math/wf_exp.c > index 38cacd95a..075b5bb0a 100644 > --- a/newlib/libm/math/wf_exp.c > +++ b/newlib/libm/math/wf_exp.c > @@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ static const float > #else > static float > #endif > -o_threshold= 8.8721679688e+01, /* 0x42b17180 */ > -u_threshold= -1.0397208405e+02; /* 0xc2cff1b5 */ > +o_threshold= 0x1.62e42ep+06, /* 0x42b17217 */ > +u_threshold= -0x1.9fe36ap+06; /* 0xc2cff1b5 */ > > #ifdef __STDC__ > float expf(float x) /* wrapper expf */ > -- > 2.35.1 Pushed. Thanks, Corinna