Re: dCollideConvexBox and dCollideConvexCapsule not implemented

"Bram Stolk" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.ode
Message-ID <[email protected]>
There should be no asserts for those.
The desired behaviour is to have the objects just pass through each other if
the collide combo is not supported.

On 9/18/07, Oleh Derevenko <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  Hi
>
> I've found that dCollideConvexBox and dCollideConvexCapsule are not
> implemented (empty fnctions). Would it be better if I put dIASSERT(false)
> into them or I should rather avoid doing that to not cause more problems for
> somebody? As to my opinion, it is necessary to add asserts there to prevent
> using that code in production. If somebody would be developing that code and
> would need testing convex with some kinds of shapes while ignoring all the
> rest kinds he/she can comment those assertions in the local copy.
>
> Oleh Derevenko
> -- ICQ: 36361783
>
> _______________________________________________
> ODE mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://ode.org/mailman/listinfo/ode
>



-- 
Zapp: Captain's log, stardate...er..
Kif: Ohhh. April 13th.
Zapp: April 13th. Point 2.

_______________________________________________
ODE mailing list
[email protected]
http://ode.org/mailman/listinfo/ode
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.