Re: Thread starvation with mutex
Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> Fri, 06 Feb 2004 16:28:47 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.phil |
|---|---|
| Organization | Red Hat, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote: > To me it reads like it is not optional, unless there is an inconsistency, > they have changed it in the patches, corregidendums or whatever the name is. > Where does it say is optional? Because scheduling policies are optional. There is no requirement to support it, especially not together with threads. - -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAJDE/2ijCOnn/RHQRAqyiAJwNdkPy1ZSVXBHg3NGKFLRwAwXAlgCeM4Jm VzpHCROMGnpfOWCnOS8z24Q= =llRU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----