Re: Thread starvation with mutex

Ulrich Drepper wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Luke Elliott wrote:
>  
>
>>I've been reading this list
>>and posting when I find issues or oddities for some time now. Isn't a
>>modicum of respect in order?
>>    
>>
>
>You might deserve respect if you'd do the necessary research first, but
>obviously you didn't.  To report problems the steps to take are:
>
>1. reproduce
>
>2. verify the assumed behavior is correct and required
>
>3. report
>
>
>As many people, you skipped point 2.  Why do the work yourself if there
>are morons out there doing the work for you?  This shows only your
>disrepect since obviously you regard your time more valuable than that
>of the readers of this list.
>
>- -- 
>➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
>
>iD8DBQFAJDA52ijCOnn/RHQRAjvOAKCmGTgRRuAinsiRLDYpjSN5FzAd1ACgzOt4
>gBEXkoggDaQ3EXA1oDNfkZg=
>=ZxW7
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>  
>

I don't recall demanding that anyone reply to my original post. 
Especially anyone who clearly has far too little time for such matters; 
why should they spend that time replying with snide comments? Seems like 
a waste of that valuable time to me.

Now, should I go do more research about pshared cond vars on a UP 
machine first or follow up on the discussion from a few months ago right 
now? Really I don't know.