Re: [PATCH] support ptrdiff_t if it has the same storage size as int, but does not alias it
Neil <[email protected]> Sun, 5 Oct 2025 02:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.scintilla.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Robin Haberkorn: What if we used int64_t consistently instead of ptrdiff_t? Sci::Position would be 64-bit even on 32-bit platforms. I guess this wouldn't be tolerable? That would be excessive. Maybe invert the conditions and prioritise ptrdiff_t before int, then avoiding int with added compile time tests where there are currently only runtime checks of largeDocument. Neil -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scintilla-interest" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/scintilla-interest/888a37ee-193c-47a0-a387-04b6f23de4c4n%40googlegroups.com.