Re: [PATCH] support ptrdiff_t if it has the same storage size as int, but does not alias it
"'Robin Haberkorn' via scintilla-interest" <[email protected]> Sun, 05 Oct 2025 09:51:09 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.scintilla.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun Oct 5, 2025 at 08:42:33 GMT +03, Neil wrote: > Without the explicit instantiations at the bottom of RunStyles.cxx, MSVC > builds fail with many 'unresolved external symbol's. > > My recollection is that builds for other platforms also failed. > Another thing to consider: What if we got rid of the RunStyles<int, X> instantiation, leaving only RunStyles<ptrdiff_t, X>? In other words, what if we fixed DISTANCE to ptrdiff_t? Would we loose much on those platforms where int != ptrdiff_t, ie. on 64-bit architectures? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scintilla-interest" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/scintilla-interest/DDAANLCXIDGZ.3900JWJ14QMFZ%40googlemail.com.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEB/6AD3js1eGB4raKarMDYY4q6voFAmjiP44ACgkQarMDYY4q 6vqpQggAle+PcjeykPkTbHw3TiJbwiiqZAvvwH+rFUBbUHnJeRYdqfQ5a1bzfH5z HKPBb5lGFs30hpeSOe8OChyjD5+ZEQf15MOzOrKRX+f39G4szEesiShg9NEHyf+O z66eVI/26aOavswEYWVMg7iwvTgEnHeSkUngiihOUEXMN0K3VsekOg+q4GUm3jyk gVPRdIcjaW4WBwvuRA3f8lj+i9u1jxdYwkZgFD2s+jHoYeVDLn1kDh+r04X4VoYu XfM/CN1TZu2PUROmk7Akskmj1HcUmBaOzj9ZgVVhm/ud9XIYaooKV4C2c1PmrD6Z hzSk3kq7aa1xpaU/+sgWIQY5PhQtyA== =v3Bc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----