Re: naming conventions
[email protected] (Robert Roebling)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.wxwindows.wxnet |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
J. Perkins wrote:
> > match those in the wxWindows documentation (and
> > disregard the C# naming scheme for this) so that
> > flags such as wx.Right become wxALIGN_RIGHT or
Currently, it actually is wx.Alignment.Right, I think.
> > simply wx.ALIGN_RIGHT. What do you think of this?
>
> That's fine with me. I prefer the second form
> (wx.ALIGN_RIGHT). We could always have both:
> wx.ALIGN_RIGHT and wx.AlignRight set to
> the same value.
I wonder e.g. Qt# does. Do they use QWindow or Q.Window.
Either way, I agree that we should use wx.Frame (or
just Frame in the wx namespace), but I am a litte
unsure about the wx.ALIGN_RIGHT vs. just wxALIGN_RIGHT.
I am used (under all current implementation) to the
second (simple) form although Perl and Python have name
spaces just like C#. It is really a matter of tasts and
we might decide to have both
namespace wx
{
const int ALIGN_RIGHT = 0x0008;
const int wxALIGN_RIGHT = ALIGN_RIGHT;
}
Robert
--
Robert Roebling, MD <[email protected]>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en