Re: One Simple Question
"J. Perkins" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.wxwindows.wxnet |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Alexander Gnauck wrote: > yes i think we should start with writing a wrapper. Mono and Portable > .NET both have exactly the same classes than Microsoft .NET. Why not > Windows.Forms. Because SWF is hopelessly tied to the windows platform, which is why you need WINE to run the Mono version on Linux. If you are really intent on having a portable API, you would do better to wrap SWF with the wx.NET API, rather than the other way around. I would *love* to have a thin, portable API over the native widgets. SharpWT is the closest to that ideal, but last I checked it didn't have a lot of momentum (over a year since the last stable release). Jason ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35 or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th! http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297