Re: One Simple Question

J. Perkins wrote:

> Because SWF is hopelessly tied to the windows platform, which is why 
> you need WINE to run the Mono version on Linux. If you are really 
> intent on having a portable API, you would do better to wrap SWF with 
> the wx.NET API, rather than the other way around.
>
> I would *love* to have a thin, portable API over the native widgets. 
> SharpWT is the closest to that ideal, but last I checked it didn't 
> have a lot of momentum (over a year since the last stable release).
>
> Jason
>
Yes. That's why I suggested in the first Place. We have Native Looking 
wxNET.
Why not just wrap GUI-only code to wxNET and then back to wxWidgets?
or even bypass wxNET..

I can't imagine that noone ever  started a project on that. {oh yes I 
know.. "hey dude. You can start it"}
We are all programmers here. I dont' understnad why we don't want to 
make our lives easier..
and we just do for every C++ GUI a wrapper for the .NET/Mono.
no offense for wxnet again. I'm talking about GTK#, FLKT.NET, FOX.NET 
QT#, Kimono etc...

afterall you have SharpDevelop, you design there, and then you just copy 
paste the Code.
and there you go!! you have a nice wxGTK app!

I really don't understand why that doesn't happen. {as I said, Mono has 
a project for this {SWF wrapper for GTK} that doesn't seem to have any 
progress} :(


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek
For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35
or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th!
http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297