Re: Request Discussion Pre-Reviews For New Licenses (chewkeanho-rlos, chewkeanho-cos, chewkeanho-gpos)

On 9/29/24 23:58, (Holloway) Chew, Kean Ho via License-discuss wrote:
> The main goal is to create a new set of license frameworks which does 
> not require issuing multiple outbound licenses (e.g. Apache 2.0 for 
> software, CC-BY-ND for images, CC-BY-SA for video, ...) for a single 
> project repository and picked up the latest updates in the market 
> implementations.

Can you explain this goal in more detail?  I think this is the 
interesting part to discuss.

 > Wait,  you mean rlos will not be approved mainly due to reason (1)
 > 
fromhttps://opensource.org/licenses/common-reasons-for-rejection-of-licenses,
 > right? I drafted this based on BSD-3-Clear and BSD-2-Patent licenses.

The BSD-2-Patent license specificially *grants* limited patent rights. 
Your license specifically *denies them*, so I don't understand how it's 
"based on" the approved license.



-- 
Josh Berkus

_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.

License-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org