Re: Advice for submitting a new license

David Woolley <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.licenses.open-source.general
Message-ID <86f1fb951961e3e35d3a4bda876dc0a666258436.camel@david-woolley.me.uk>
What alleged defect in CC0 are you claiming to address?

"SHOULD NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM OR DAMAGES YOU MAKE UNDER PERMITTED
LAW." seems to be a wish rather than something that is enforceable in
law.  What is a "permitted law" anyway?

On Fri, 2026-08-07 at 11:39 +0000, AMOGUSForever via License-discuss
wrote:
> Hello, i wanted to submit a license for license review called UPD
> I have tried to submit the review directly to OSI license review list
> but got rejected by the moderator saying that i should look at 
> https://opensource.org/licenses/review-process.
> However i do not see any issues about my review and didn't got any
> other advice from the moderator.
> (in case you want to check its attached to the email)
> 
> Please post any possible improvement for both review text (to
> resubmit)
> and the license text itself so that it gets ready for license review.

_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.

License-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.