Re: Question on using eval...

"Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mathematics.pari.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2023-01-03 12:11, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 10:43:48AM +0100, Ruud H.G. van Tol wrote:
>> The "symbolic equality" also needs to be defined first.
>>
>> ? f(a,b,c) = (a / b) + c;
>> ? g(a,b,c) = a / b + c;
>> ? h(a,b,c) = c + a / b;
>> ? print([f == g, f == h, g == h, g == f, f === g]);
>> [1, 0, 0, 1, 1]
> Indeed, comparing closures means comparing the bytecode generated by the internal compiler.
> The parser ignores useless parentheses so f and g are identical.

How human ;)

I would prefer it to (optionally?) generate the same bytecode
(and maybe also a function-fingerprint or -identity)
for either f,g,h though, or is that not a worthy goal?


This assumes ignoring spurious rounding effects,
but I think that is only good,
as there are always cleaner ways to code those in.

-- Ruud
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.