Re: some question about access I/O memory in Pistachio

"于爱民" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.micro-kernel.l4.l4ka.general
Message-ID <200712051737812.SM03836@lois-4c7e856724>
Hi,Espen Skoglund!

	Thanks for your suggestion and I have solved the problem now.

    However I have another confusion that I want to get some help form you or others.
    I created two threads which requested the physical page from sigma0(at address 0xdef40f00) respectively. As the l4-x2 manual says "Sigma0 responds with a map reject message if the page is reserved (i.e., kernel space) or already mapped to a different thread, or if memory is exhausted". I thought one of these threads would get a nilfpage. The fact were both of  them got the fpage successlly. With the same code, I change the address from 0xdef40f00 to 0x06400000, and the test result was consitent to what the l4-x2 manual.

    Is there any difference when Sigma0 handles the address region in upper 1GB and lower 3GB address?

======= 2007-12-05 00:35:21 您在来信中写道:=======

>Sigma0 (or any task for that matter) can not in general access the
>upper 1GB of its virtual address space.  However, sigma0 can *map* any
>part of its upper 1GB of address space (physical address space) to
>anyone.  What you need to do is to have some task (e.g., the root
>task) to request the apropriate physical page from sigma0 (at address
>0xdef40f00 in your case) to be mapped into somewhere in the lower 3GB
>address region (see user/include/l4/sigma0.h).  The physical memory
>can then be accessed at whichever address you chose to have it mapped
>into.
>
>	eSk
>
>

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
			
thanks

        [email protected]
          2007-12-05
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.