Re: [mh] What’s better than Insteon?
H Plato <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.misc.misterhouse.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
There’s also zwave. The only MH zwave support is the razberry module I put together. It has ‘push’ support, so MH is updated in real-time when local switches change state.I’m working on fully using process_item for connectivity, to reduce the risk of network induced pauses to the main loop. I’ve been running my razberry for 5 years or so and it’s been pretty reliable. > On Dec 12, 2020, at 3:04 AM, Tom MacLean <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have an aging misterhouse and Insteon setup. I’m getting a bit annoyed with replacing Insteon modules (particularly the ones that were buried in my kitchen ceiling!) and also they are a bit quirky. (If I turn off a bunch of lights too quickly, a whole bunch of other lights turn on.) > > I am planning a basement reno that will lead to a bunch more modules. Is there another automation technology I should be considering? > > I would like to avoid cloud-based solutions. > I am a little leery of bogging down my wifi with old-standard equipment. > Mister house automation is mandatory. > UL/CSA is mandatory > More cosmetic options than Insteon would be nice. > > I’d appreciate your advice! > > > > More variety in swit > > > Sent from my iPhone > > ________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe from this list, go to: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/misterhouse-users > ________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe from this list, go to: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/misterhouse-users