Re: [mh] .mht vs .xml

Giles Godart-Brown <[email protected]> Wed, 20 Sep 2023 08:17:23 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.misc.misterhouse.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============5119972801545241643==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------Vbdoo5KP5bcEYJDqnqLB0g8a"
Content-Language: en-GB

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------Vbdoo5KP5bcEYJDqnqLB0g8a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

I find myself overloading objects from external files instead of 
extending the A format, so I would welcome a more flexible configuration 
approach however I think it raises 2 questions;

  * Are there enough of us with the time to work on it?
  * If we are going to change should we consider something even more
    radical like JSON or even a MySQL database?

Giles


On 20/09/2023 03:23, Brian M wrote:
> As I'm rummaging around in the bin/mh, I'm seeing a lot of stuff about 
> translating .mht files to .xml. Are .xml files the norm now, instead 
> of .mht? Are .mht files deprecated? I ask because I'm becoming 
> frustrated with the limitations of the Format=A .mht files, and 
> thinking that .xml should open up more options and more flexibility 
> for me. What's the current thinking on this stuff?
>
>                -Brian M.
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to: 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/misterhouse-users
>

--------------Vbdoo5KP5bcEYJDqnqLB0g8a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <font size="4"><font face="Calibri">I find myself overloading
        objects from external files instead of extending the A format,
        so I would welcome a more flexible configuration approach
        however I think it raises 2 questions;<br>
      </font></font>
    <ul>
      <li><font size="4"><font face="Calibri">Are there enough of us
            with the time to work on it?</font></font></li>
      <li><font size="4"><font face="Calibri">If we are going to change
            should we consider something even more radical like JSON or
            even a MySQL database?</font></font></li>
    </ul>
    <font size="4"><font face="Calibri">Giles<br>
        <br>
      </font></font><br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 20/09/2023 03:23, Brian M wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:[email protected]">As
      I'm rummaging around in the bin/mh, I'm seeing a lot of stuff
      about translating .mht files to .xml. Are .xml files the norm now,
      instead of .mht? Are .mht files deprecated? I ask because I'm
      becoming frustrated with the limitations of the Format=A .mht
      files, and thinking that .xml should open up more options and more
      flexibility for me. What's the current thinking on this stuff?
      <br>
      <br>
                     -Brian M.
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      ________________________________________________________
      <br>
      To unsubscribe from this list, go to:
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/misterhouse-users">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/misterhouse-users</a>
      <br>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>

--------------Vbdoo5KP5bcEYJDqnqLB0g8a--


--===============5119972801545241643==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline


--===============5119972801545241643==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from this list, go to: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/misterhouse-users


--===============5119972801545241643==--