Re: Hypostatic And Prescisive Abstraction
Jon Awbrey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.inquiry,gmane.comp.misc.ontology.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o HAPA. Note 4 o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o | Abstractions are particularly congenial to mathematics. Everyday life | first, for example, found the need of that class of abstractions which | we call 'collections'. Instead of saying that some human beings are | males and all the rest females, it was found convenient to say that | 'mankind' consists of the male 'part' and the female 'part'. The | same thought makes classes of collections, such as pairs, leashes, | quatrains, hands, weeks, dozens, baker's dozens, sonnets, scores, | quires, hundreds, long hundreds, gross, reams, thousands, myriads, | lacs, millions, milliards, milliasses, etc. These have suggested | a great branch of mathematics.* | | Again, a point moves: it is by abstraction that the geometer says that | it "describes a line". This line, though an abstraction, itself moves; | and this is regarded as generating a surface; and so on. | | So likewise, when the analyst treats operations as themselves subjects of | operations, a method whose utility will not be denied, this is another | instance of abstraction. Maxwell's notion of a tension exercised upon | lines of electrical force, transverse to them, is somewhat similar. | | These examples exhibit the great rolling billows of abstraction in the ocean | of mathematical thought; but when we come to a minute examination of it, | we shall find, in every department, incessant ripples of the same form | of thought, of which the examples I have mentioned give no hint. | |* Of course, the moment a collection is recognized as an abstraction we have | to admit that even a percept is an abstraction or represents an abstraction, | if matter has parts. It therefore becomes difficult to maintain that all | abstractions are fictions. | | C.S. Peirce, CP 4.235, "The Simplest Mathematics", | Chapter 3 of the "Minute Logic", Jan-Feb 1902. o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o