Re: Hypostatic And Prescisive Abstraction
Jon Awbrey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.inquiry,gmane.comp.misc.ontology.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o HAPA. Note 8 o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o | The logical term 'subjectal abstraction' here requires a | word of explanation; for there are few treatises on logic | which notice subjectal abstraction under any name, except so | far as to confuse it with precisive abstraction which is an | entirely different logical function. When we say that the | Columbia library building is 'large', this remark is a result | of precisive abstraction by which the man who makes the remark | leaves out of account all the other features of his image of | the building, and takes the word "large" which is entirely | unlike that image -- and when I say the word is unlike the | image, I mean that the general signification of the word is | utterly disparate from the image, which involves no predicates | at all. Such is 'precisive abstraction'. But now if this man | goes on to remark that the largeness of the building is very | impressive, he converts the applicability of that predicate | from being a way of thinking about the building to being | itself a subject of thought, and that operation is | 'subjectal abstraction'. | | C.S. Peirce, CP 4.332, "Ordinals", circa 1905. o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o