Re: Hypostatic And Prescisive Abstraction
Jon Awbrey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.inquiry,gmane.comp.misc.ontology.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o HAPA. Note 10 o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o | Relatives Of Second Intention | | The general method of graphical representation of propositions has now | been given in all its essential elements, except, of course, that we | have not, as yet, studied any truths concerning special relatives; | for to do so would seem, at first, to be "extralogical". Logic in | this stage of its development may be called 'paradisaical logic', | because it represents the state of Man's cognition before the | Fall. For although, with this apparatus, it easy to write | propositions necessarily true, it is absolutely impossible | to write any which is necessarily false, or, in any way | which that stage of logic affords, to find out that | anything is false. The mind has not as yet eaten | of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Truth | and Falsity. | | Probably it will not be doubted that every child in | its mental development necessarily passes through | a stage in which he has some ideas, but yet has | never recognised that an idea may be erroneous; | and a stage that every child necessarily passes | through must have been formerly passed through | by the race in its adult development. It may | be doubted whether many of the lower animals | have any clear and steady conception of | falsehood; for their instincts work | so unerringly that there is little | to force it upon their attention. | Yet plainly without a knowledge | of falsehood no development | of discursive reason can | take place. | | C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 3.488, |"The Logic of Relatives", 'Monist', vol. 7, | pp. 161-217, 1897. o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o