Re: Hypostatic And Prescisive Abstraction
Jon Awbrey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.inquiry,gmane.comp.misc.ontology.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o HAPA. Note 11 o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o | Relatives Of Second Intention (cont.) | | This paradisaical logic appears in the study of non-relative formal logic. | But 'there' no possible avenue appears by which the knowledge of falsehood | could be brought into this Garden of Eden except by the arbitrary and | inexplicable introduction of the Serpent in the guise of a proposition | necessarily false. The logic of relatives affords such an avenue, | and 'that', the very avenue by which in actual development, | this stage of logic supervenes. It is the avenue of | experience and logical reflexion. | | By 'logical' reflexion, I mean the observation of thoughts | in their expressions. Aquinas remarked that this sort of | reflexion is requisite to furnish us with those ideas | which, from lack of contrast, ordinary external | experience fails to bring into prominence. | He called such ideas 'second intentions'. | | It is by means of 'relatives of second intention' | that the general method of logical representation | is to find completion. | | C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 3.489-490, |"The Logic of Relatives", 'The Monist', vol. 7, | pp. 161-217, 1897. o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o