Re: Hypostatic And Prescisive Abstraction
Jon Awbrey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.inquiry,gmane.comp.misc.ontology.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o HAPA. Note 12 o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o | One branch of deductive logic, of which from the nature of | things ordinary logic could give no satisfactory account, | relates to the vitally important matter of abstraction. | | Indeed, the student of ordinary logic naturally regards abstraction, | or the passage from "the rose smells sweet" to "the rose has perfume", | to be a quasi-grammatical matter, calling for little or no notice from | the logician. The fact is, however, that almost every great step in | mathematical reasoning derives its importance from the fact that it | involves an abstraction. | | For by means of abstraction, the transitory elements of thought, | the 'epea pteroenta' [winged words], are made substantive elements, | as James terms them, 'epea apteroenta' [plucked words].* It thus | becomes possible to study their relations and to apply to these | relations discoveries already made respecting analogous relations. | In this way, for example, operations become themselves the subjects | of operations. | |* William James, 'Principles of Psychology', vol. 1, p. 243. | | C.S. Peirce, 'Collected Papers', CP 3.642, in dictionary entry for "Relatives", | J.M. Baldwin (ed.), 'Dictionary of Philosophy & Psychology', vol. 2, pp. 447-450. Incidental Musement: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?lookup=Hom.+Il.+1.172 o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o