Effective Logical Formalism
Jon Awbrey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.inquiry,gmane.comp.misc.ontology.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o ELF. Discussion Note 1 o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o Gary, Jack, John, Murray, et al. By way of getting better mileage down the yellow-brick road to SUO City out of this discussion, and since we haven't really been talking about RDF or Topic Maps for quite a while now, let's put away our 6-packs and our 2-4's and focus a little bit more on the properties of the good enough logical framework that we might hope to see someday. If the "Streamlined Common Logic" (SCL) shapes up to that, fine. So I will bracket my anxieties for the time being and keep my eyes on the prize. From the sorts of things that I've seen in the past, though, I know that there's a natural human tendency to pump up a very big, very beautiful balloon of elegant expansiveness and potential expressiveness, all in principle, that just never quite gets down to, indeed, displays a natural abhorrence of brass tacks. I will refer to the ideal candidate system as the "effective logical formalism" (ELF). There are probably many that would qualify, but I'll discuss the ELF in singular terms. For my part, as far as its logical character goes, I demand very little of the ELF, and I expect the ELF to demand very little of me in its turn. That is, I would not want to be obliged to go along with any assumptions that are not logically necessary, or more contingently, that are not the logical consequences of assumptions that I explictly choose for the sake of describing an object reality. The ELF cannot help us to examine our logical options fairly if its calling into action prescribes one choice and even precludes critical reflection on the larger array of choices. Now, I am not so naive as to think that we are likely to find any kinds of "ontologically neutral languages" out there, or becoming available to us anytime soon, not in any absolute sense of the words, but I do hold out the more differential hope that we can become aware of isolated assumptions about actual or possible existence that we had been taking for granted all along, quite unawares and hidden from our reflective critique, since this is a sort of development that has occurred often enough in the history of ideas. So it is a minimal task that the ELF should help with that. More Later, Jon Awbrey o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o