Re: Information = Comprehension x Extension -- Discussion
Jon Awbrey <[email protected]> Fri, 23 Jan 2004 08:12:19 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.inquiry,gmane.comp.misc.ontology.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o ICE. Discussion Note 30 o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o Each "lattice of coordinates" (LOC) for the universe W% = [c, r] has four elements, which may be designated by the same collection of cell coordinates: "c r", "c (r)", "(c) r", "(c)(r)". The only difference between LOC's is in the arbitrary choice of one of these four as the anchor point, base point, or bottom element. Figure 7 shows the LOC for the universe [c, r] at the base point (c)(r). o-----------------------------------------------------------o | | | c r | | | | o | | / \ | | / \ | | / \ | | / \ | | / \ | | / \ | | / \ | | r (c) o o (r) c | | \ / | | \ / | | \ / | | \ / | | \ / | | \ / | | \ / | | o | | | | (c) (r) | | | o-----------------------------------------------------------o Figure 7. Lattice of Coordinates for [c, r] at (c)(r) But a LOC is a radically frame-dependent device and thus it gives us no key to the commonwealth of invariant orderings that we desire for our current realm of logical purposes. So let's turn to another source of order. The "lattice of predicates" (LOP) for the universe W% = [c, r] has 2^4 = 16 elements, which puts it just beyond my ability to draw in the current frame. However, the quotient lattice that we get by postulating the truth of the proposition (r (c)) has just 16/2 = 8 elements, allowing me to draft it in full detail. Figure 8 shows the lattice for the predicate set W^ = (W -> !B!) modulo the equivalence relation that sets r (c) = 0 and adjusts all of the other predicates accordingly. In a logical frame of mind one tends to think of quotient operations in terms of the propositions that are equated to 1, or stipulated to be true, so let us denominate this quotient lattice as [c, r]/(r(c)). In the Figure, I label each point with the two propositions in [c, r] that are equivalent mod (r(c)) in [c, r]/(r(c)). By the way, () and (()) are alternate names for 0 and 1, respectively, while (u, v) is the exclusive disjunction of u and v, and ((u, v)) is the logical equivalence of u and v. o-----------------------------------------------------------o | | | (( )) o (r (c)) | | /|\ | | / | \ | | / | \ | | / | \ | | / | \ | | / | \ | | / | \ | | / | \ | | / | \ | | / | \ | | / | \ | | / | \ | | (c r) / ((c) (r)) \ (c (r)) | | (r) o c o ((c, r)) | | |\ / \ /| | | | \ / \ / | | | | \ / \ / | | | | \ / \ / | | | | \ / \ / | | | | \ / \ / | | | | \ / | | | | / \ / \ | | | | / \ / \ | | | | / \ / \ | | | | / \ / \ | | | | / \ / \ | | | |/ \ / \| | | (c, r) o (c) o r | | c (r) \ (c) (r) / c r | | \ | / | | \ | / | | \ | / | | \ | / | | \ | / | | \ | / | | \ | / | | \ | / | | \ | / | | \ | / | | \ | / | | \|/ | | r (c) o ( ) | | | o-----------------------------------------------------------o Figure 8. Quotient Lattice of Predicates for [c, r] mod (r (c)) It's a little bit late to be doing this sort of stuff, so I'll see how many errors I can find in the morning. NB AM. I found six errors. So glad I waited to send. Jon Awbrey o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o http://www.cs.bsu.edu/homepages/mighty/history.html o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o