Re: Mac stuff
"Roger Binns" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.bitpim.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <006e01c500ab$6588f810$04000100@rogersqyvr14d3> |
>> In the case of odd dialogs, I'd love to see your examples. I'd say >> Windows is far and above the king of useless confirmation dialogs and >> meaningless errors. Just curious which ones you are referring to. Here is another one. When going to install a software package (which contains files I am going to execute), I usually get asked if a program that comes with the package can be run to see if the package should be installed. Why exactly would I trust a package enough to want to install it, but not trust any pre-installation checks it has? Unix SVR4 packages do this as well. They even point out the pre-install checks will be run as root. This is all one of those security pretense things. Either the entire package is good or not. Under what circumstances would I be fearful of running the pre-installation checks it includes and not the contents it later installs. Roger ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl