Fwd: Samsung Brew Call logs
Michael Antal <[email protected]> Tue, 12 May 2015 17:07:51 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.bitpim.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOwgBAvoLEtgucEWkPiDKH+Liy_0dpxH-ckhWH0rpR3NeRGVrA@mail.gmail.com> |
--===============8090830231809081567== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1146c90067ac0b0515e8e4cc --001a1146c90067ac0b0515e8e4cc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hello all. I am looking at Bitpim interpretation of Call Logs from an older model Samsung CDMA phone (SCH-U410). I can see the 4 byte value (offset 0x34 in each file) within each clog file that is the BitPim interpreted date/time. However, the interpreted dates/times from these 4-byte values (interpreted as Epoch Jan 6, 1980) do not mesh with what I am told about the phone. Interestingly, the clog files have metadata in the form of modification dates/times that *do* match with what I understand to be consistent with the phone. I have some questions regarding these records. First, am I properly interpreting the 4-byte value as the correct date/time for the calls? Next, how does the clog data change to reflect a newer date/time than the file modification date/time? Could these file modification dates/times be related to the actual date/time of the calls? If so, what would the 4-byte value represent? Thanks for any assistance with this. --001a1146c90067ac0b0515e8e4cc Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Hello all= .=C2=A0 I am looking at Bitpim interpretation of Call Logs from an older mo= del Samsung CDMA phone (SCH-U410).=C2=A0 I can see the 4 byte value (offset= 0x34 in each file) within each clog file that is the BitPim interpreted da= te/time.=C2=A0 However, the interpreted dates/times from these 4-byte value= s (interpreted as Epoch Jan 6, 1980) do not mesh with what I am told about = the phone.=C2=A0 Interestingly, the clog files have metadata in the form of= modification dates/times that <i>do</i> match with what I understand to be= consistent with the phone.=C2=A0 I have some questions regarding these rec= ords.=C2=A0 First, am I properly interpreting the 4-byte value as the corre= ct date/time for the calls? Next, how does the clog data change to reflect = a newer date/time than the file modification date/time?=C2=A0 Could these f= ile modification dates/times be related to the actual date/time of the call= s?=C2=A0 If so, what would the 4-byte value represent?=C2=A0 Thanks for any= assistance with this.</div> </div> </div><br></div> --001a1146c90067ac0b0515e8e4cc-- --===============8090830231809081567== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y --===============8090830231809081567== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ BitPim-user mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe or change options at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitpim-user There are several hundred people on this list. Please be courteous, on topic and follow the instructions before posting http://www.bitpim.org/help/support.htm --===============8090830231809081567==--