RE: I minor error found in gw/smsc_at2.c

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[email protected]]
> "Nektarios K. Papadopoulos" wrote:
> > I think that passing octstr_case_compare to list_search, makes it to
> > search for at least one non matching list element, insteat for one
> > matching.
> > So I suggest changing it to octstr_item_match, since we 
> care only for
> > digits.
> > 
> > the diff with todays cvs is attached, in case I am not wrong.
> 
> any votes from the others, please?!
> 
> Putting this at least to STATUS for now.

I agree. its an honest mistake - octstr_case_compare returns 0 for a
match, while list_search expects 1 for a match. using item_match will be
correct.

Oded Arbel
m-Wise Inc.
[email protected]

--
Maintainer's Motto:
If we can't fix it, it ain't broke.