RE: [RFC] CVS rules for STATUS

Hi.

If people agree, I'd like to at least note the SIM buffering patch I
submitted to the list in STATUS (msgid :
[email protected])

BTW - I was wondering - how many people (count, not interested in names
:-) have CVS write access ?

TIA

Oded Arbel
m-Wise Inc.
[email protected]

--
Ninety eight percent of the adults in this country are decent,
hardworking, honest Americans. It's
the other lousy two percent that get all the publicity. But then, we
elected them.
	-- Lily Tomlin


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 1:25 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [RFC] CVS rules for STATUS
> 
> 
> I would like to advice that changes to the STATUS file in the gateway
> CVS module should *not* be logged to ChangeLog, two main reasons:
> 
> 1) STATUS is not considered to be module specific code and hence
> ChangeLog messages about this file would fuzzy up the meaning of
> ChangeLog, IMO.
> 
> 2) Acceptance for CVS contributors to keep STATUS up to date (which is
> the main intension) is raised, because double editing (STATUS and
> ChangeLog) is not required.
> 
> So, heads up if there are complains about this rule.
> 
> BTW, I haven't seen anyone from the CVS write permission users to
> update STATUS?!
> Please keep it up to date, it is ment to be a postulation file of the
> current issues that are discussed and tracked at the developers list.
> Especialy the "Status:" fields should be edited by the corresponding
> responsible parties of the single modules.
> 
> Stipe
> 
> [email protected]
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Wapme Systems AG
> 
> Münsterstr. 248
> 40470 Düsseldorf
> 
> Tel: +49-211-74845-0
> Fax: +49-211-74845-299
> 
> E-Mail: [email protected]
> Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> wapme.net - wherever you are
> 
>