Re: PID bug?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Rapaport" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; "Bruno David Rodrigues"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 9:54 PM
Subject: PID bug?


> My guys worked overtime this week sending EMS's with kannel,
> and they report that they were not able to send PID's properly
> with Bruno's new PID support, until they made a few changes.
> It's apparently working for us (EMI2) now.


uh?
PID is a simple byte field in UCP. What could gone wrong ?
I'm sucessfully using PID in UCP and AT2, for SIM Toolkit (PID=127),
"ping" (64) and replace message (65->)

(BTW: My Ericsson T68 doesn't even receive correctly the ping and replace
messages: it ignores ping and it's funny with replace: if I have one message
in memory and send a pid=65 message, my mobile will have two copies of
the old message (and three and more if more messages are sent) and nowhere
is the new message)

> I will ask the guys if they have any diffs to contribute
> Monday, hope that's not too late.

Send the diffs so I can see what's happening


> Also, we are having problems with reassembly
> of long 8-bit SMS, with all headers (including concatenation
> headers) precreated.  These same PDU's sent directly work fine,
> but Kannel seems to mangle them still.

Another strange thing... I'm sending too long text messages and picture
messages with UCP and AT2.....


>
> More info Monday.
>
> ____________________________________________
> Steve Rapaport
> CTO, A-Tono
>
>
>

--
Bruno David Rodrigues
Vodafone Telecel Portugaldeve