PAM authentifcation in sendsms_post and sendota
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Wapme Systems AG |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi there, I see that smsbox_sendsms_post() and smsbox_sendota_post() are both calling directly authorise_username() for username and password authentification, while the others (i.e. smsbox_req_sendsms()) are calling authorise_user() and hence give the PAM module a chance to grap for the authentication. AFAIS, this behaviour bypasses the PAM module. Is anyone using actively the PAM authentification? We should change this to have the same authentication dependencies in all processing smsbox_foo() functions?! Stipe -- Hope to see you at my presentations: "Virtual Server solution for Linux using FreeVSD" at O'Reilly Open Source Convention 2002, Sheraton San Diego Hotel and Marina, San Diego, CA. USA July 22-26, 2002 [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- wapme.net - wherever you are