RE: SMPP Defer ability

Alex Judd <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
You sure you mean smsc_smpp.c validity period code as the version I have 
(and cvs has) doesn't appear to have any validity code setting in it (more 
is the shame!).

Therefore is any of smsc_at(2), smsc_cimd2, smsc_emi2 or smsc_ois share 
the same structure I'll borrow it from there and implement it.

Alex

On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Michael Mulcahy wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> The code used for the validity period in SMPP may be reused for
> the scheduled delivery period in the SMPP module as the formats
> are the same.
> 
> Regards,
> Michael Mulcahy.
> 
> ANAM Wireless Internet Solutions
> http://www.anam.com mailto:[email protected]
> +353 1 284 7555 
> Castle Yard, Saint Patrick's Road, Dalkey, County Dublin, Ireland 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Alex Judd
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 1:16 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: SMPP Defer ability
> > 
> > 
> > Answering my own questions a little bit, SMPP does support 
> > schedule_delivery_time as an octet in the submit sms pdu and 
> > is definied 
> > in gw/smpp_pdu.def however isn't used.
> > 
> > The docs. say it is an octet of length 17 so it should be 
> > possible if we 
> > know the formatting to construct this. The code from the emi2 
> > driver is 
> > below - anyone know if the times are the same format?
> > 
> >     if (msg->sms.deferred) {
> >         str = octstr_create("1");
> >         emimsg->fields[E50_DD] = str;
> >         tm = gw_localtime(time(NULL) + msg->sms.deferred * 60);
> >         sprintf(p, "%02d%02d%02d%02d%02d",
> >             tm.tm_mday, tm.tm_mon + 1, tm.tm_year % 100,
> >             tm.tm_hour, tm.tm_min);
> >         str = octstr_create(p);
> >         emimsg->fields[E50_DDT] = str;
> >     }
> > 
> > because if they are we can set the 
> > pdu->u.submit_sm.schedule_delivery_time 
> > to be the right time and go with that.
> > 
> > Alex
> > 
> > On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Alex Judd wrote:
> > 
> > > smsc_emi2 (and smsc_http) have the ability to defer 
> > messages with the 
> > > sms.deferred. Has anyone implemented this for SMPP and does 
> > it support it 
> > > in the PDU structure?
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Alex Judd
> > http://www.skywire.co.uk
> > 
> 

-- 
Alex Judd
http://www.skywire.co.uk
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.