RE: SMPP Defer ability

I think someone submitted a patch for this, obviously it didn't make
it to CVS. I don't have the mail so maybe someone else has it. If you
look up section 7 in the SMPP 3.4 spec then that will have the time 
format required. Its pretty similar to emi I think with one or two minor 
changes.

Regards,
Michael.

ANAM Wireless Internet Solutions
http://www.anam.com mailto:[email protected]
+353 1 284 7555 
Castle Yard, Saint Patrick's Road, Dalkey, County Dublin, Ireland 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Judd [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 2:51 PM
> To: Michael Mulcahy
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: SMPP Defer ability
> 
> 
> You sure you mean smsc_smpp.c validity period code as the 
> version I have 
> (and cvs has) doesn't appear to have any validity code 
> setting in it (more 
> is the shame!).
> 
> Therefore is any of smsc_at(2), smsc_cimd2, smsc_emi2 or 
> smsc_ois share 
> the same structure I'll borrow it from there and implement it.
> 
> Alex
> 
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Michael Mulcahy wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > The code used for the validity period in SMPP may be reused for
> > the scheduled delivery period in the SMPP module as the formats
> > are the same.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Michael Mulcahy.
> > 
> > ANAM Wireless Internet Solutions
> > http://www.anam.com mailto:[email protected]
> > +353 1 284 7555 
> > Castle Yard, Saint Patrick's Road, Dalkey, County Dublin, Ireland 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [email protected]
> > > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Alex Judd
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 1:16 PM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: SMPP Defer ability
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Answering my own questions a little bit, SMPP does support 
> > > schedule_delivery_time as an octet in the submit sms pdu and 
> > > is definied 
> > > in gw/smpp_pdu.def however isn't used.
> > > 
> > > The docs. say it is an octet of length 17 so it should be 
> > > possible if we 
> > > know the formatting to construct this. The code from the emi2 
> > > driver is 
> > > below - anyone know if the times are the same format?
> > > 
> > >     if (msg->sms.deferred) {
> > >         str = octstr_create("1");
> > >         emimsg->fields[E50_DD] = str;
> > >         tm = gw_localtime(time(NULL) + msg->sms.deferred * 60);
> > >         sprintf(p, "%02d%02d%02d%02d%02d",
> > >             tm.tm_mday, tm.tm_mon + 1, tm.tm_year % 100,
> > >             tm.tm_hour, tm.tm_min);
> > >         str = octstr_create(p);
> > >         emimsg->fields[E50_DDT] = str;
> > >     }
> > > 
> > > because if they are we can set the 
> > > pdu->u.submit_sm.schedule_delivery_time 
> > > to be the right time and go with that.
> > > 
> > > Alex
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Alex Judd wrote:
> > > 
> > > > smsc_emi2 (and smsc_http) have the ability to defer 
> > > messages with the 
> > > > sms.deferred. Has anyone implemented this for SMPP and does 
> > > it support it 
> > > > in the PDU structure?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Alex Judd
> > > http://www.skywire.co.uk
> > > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Alex Judd
> http://www.skywire.co.uk