Re: repost: [PATCH] SMPP: data_coding (deliver_sm) votes?!

Andreas Fink <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Freitag, November 22, 2002, at 03:54  Uhr, Alan McNatty wrote:

> Hi Oded,
>
> It was included - but as mentioned implied iconv was required not
> optional. It sounds like the preference would be to have as optional
> (propagate the code with a few ifdef's, etc) and default to
> gsm_to_latin1 conversion regardless of encoding (will look at this
> shortly).


Why gsm_to_latin1 if we know encoding?
I would leave it in gsm character set as far as possible because the 
receiver might want to do its own conversion. And converting it to 
latin1 is not lossless.

in any case not convert it if coding means its binary

Andreas Fink
Global Networks, Inc.

------------------------------------------------------------------
Tel: +41-61-6666333  Fax: +41-61-6932729   Mobile: +41-79-2457333
Global Networks, Inc. Clarastrasse 3, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
Web: http://www.global-networks.ch/      [email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------
Member of the GSM Association
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.