RE: repost: [PATCH] SMPP: data_coding (deliver_sm) votes?!

Oded Arbel <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Organization m-Wise mobile solutions
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 04:54, Alan McNatty wrote:

> Hi Oded,
> 
> It was included - but as mentioned implied iconv was required not
> optional. 

No so - configure will check for it and set HAVE_ICONV only if the
header file exists (which to me suggests that the library is installed -
I don't know many people who hold on their build systems headers for
libraries they don't have installed.

> It sounds like the preference would be to have as optional
> (propagate the code with a few ifdef's, etc) and default to
> gsm_to_latin1 conversion regardless of encoding (will look at this
> shortly).

Don't think that's a correct approach. coding anything to latin1
regardless of the SMSC's preferences or the user's preferences just
because they user did not specificly enable a feature which should be
auto-detected does not sound like a good idea to me.

--
Oded Arbel
m-Wise mobile solutions


______________________________________________________
 Scanned and protected by Inflex and McAfee AntiVirus
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.