Re: [RFC] version number for development release

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

I agree with Bruno. +1 from me (if I may to vote?)...

On Saturday 04 January 2003 16:34, Bruno David Simões Rodrigues wrote:
> Citando Stipe Tolj <[email protected]>:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I asked what the versioning should look like for the upcoming
> > development release?! Should I name it 1.3.0 or then 1.3.1 for the
> > stabilized version or 1.3.0rc1?
>
> Just tag it as 1.3.0. If it's a development branch, it doesn't need to be
> "stable". Then tag 1.3.1, 1.3.2 as soon as someone implements something
> "big" and we need to know "1.3.2 was before implementing xpto and
> everything was working".
>
> PS: Stipe: I was in Düsseldorf some weeks ago and I've tried to call you
> and a "nice operator girl" said that your number was not assigned
> (something like that for what I understood from german :)

- -- 
Best Regards / Mit besten Grüßen aus Köln

Dipl.-Ing.
Alexander Malysh
___________________________________

Centrium GmbH
Ehrenstrasse 2
50672 Köln

Fon: +49 (0221) 277 49 150
Fax: +49 (0221) 277 49 109

email: [email protected]
web: http://www.centrium.de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+Fw2FnX3e5W+uJ0ERAr/CAJ4v6CY/mAehxjzDL+ajc2d1IRogaQCgo1tk
pHZJBel5k/xSVA1tbgQ6CA8=
=ZZuj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----