RE: [Fwd: [Changing Kannel MIME parsing] (was: Re: Wappush Problems)]

>
> forwarded to the list.
>
> Paul, this is something for you I guess ;)
>
>From what I have read in the WAP 2.0 Specifications the PPG Documents
should
be formatted as correct XML. The specification of XML is lovely and vague,
whilst most of it spends a lot of time stating that both CR and LF are valid
characters the only advice about a valid end of line is that in Chapter
2.11(for example http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#sec-line-ends). This states
that processors should always pass applications end-of-lines formatted as
LFs only. Its a little difficult to stretch the definition to say that this
implies that all XML must be terminated by LF only but nowhere do I see the
reverse either...

In short why does this thread consider LF not to be a valid end-of-line?


The PUSH document is MIME encoded. The PAP bodypart of that MIME document
is an XML document.

We were, as far as I was aware, discussing the parsing of *MIME*
terminators,
and not the terminators of whatever happens to be the content of the
individual MIME bodyparts.