Re: [Fwd: [Changing Kannel MIME parsing] (was: Re: Wappush Problems)]

On Tuesday, April 8, 2003, at 11:51 AM, Paul Keogh wrote:

>>
>> forwarded to the list.
>>
>> Paul, this is something for you I guess ;)
>>
>> From what I have read in the WAP 2.0 Specifications the PPG Documents
> should
> be formatted as correct XML. The specification of XML is lovely and 
> vague,
> whilst most of it spends a lot of time stating that both CR and LF are 
> valid
> characters the only advice about a valid end of line is that in Chapter
> 2.11(for example http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#sec-line-ends). This 
> states
> that processors should always pass applications end-of-lines formatted 
> as
> LFs only. Its a little difficult to stretch the definition to say that 
> this
> implies that all XML must be terminated by LF only but nowhere do I 
> see the
> reverse either...
>
> In short why does this thread consider LF not to be a valid 
> end-of-line?
>
>
> The PUSH document is MIME encoded. The PAP bodypart of that MIME 
> document
> is an XML document.
>
> We were, as far as I was aware, discussing the parsing of *MIME*
> terminators,
> and not the terminators of whatever happens to be the content of the
> individual MIME bodyparts.

Yep. *Xml parser* parses the xml document, and we get an parser level 
error, if we have problems
here. We got no parser level error, so the document should be ok.

Aarno