Re: [PATCH] Re: Problems with the handling of DLR's / SMPP

Alexander Malysh wrote:
> Yep, I know this too. But it is not spec conform. If the client
> doesn't request intermediately dlr's then smpp server should not send
> these (in kannel case those were missinterpreted) and second point: I
> have not found in smpp spec. 'ACKED' status (this status called
> ACCEPTD, see smpp 3.4 issue 1.2 page 168).

True. But in the same section it says...

"The format for this Delivery Receipt message is SMSC vendor specific but
following is a typical example of Delivery Receipt report."

A prime example of SMPP spec vagueness, specifications that allow for the
vendor to legitimately change things about. Sigh :/

In spite of this, I tried to keep our interface as 'typical' a real SMSC as
possible when I wrote it, whilst at the same time making some of our more
advanced features available.

-- 
Ian Cass