RE: Service description parameters in CIMD2

"Angel Fradejas" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Dziugas,

As always, each operator does different things: one may include param 069 in
the MOs, others may not. 
And talking about billing, that is really a mess: although cimd2 spec has a
explicit param to pass billing information (param 064 TARIFF CLASS), my
experience is that each operator uses whatever he feels.

For example, we have all these cases:

1) operator wants billing info for MTs on param 064 (wow, spec compliant!!)
2) operator wants billing info for MTs with something like <sender><binfo>
on param 023 (ORIGINATING ADDRESS)
3) operator wants billing info for MTs with something like
<PREFIX><sender><binfo><SUFFIX> on param 023 (ORIGINATING ADDRESS)

As you see, this is quite a mess. We're working on a flexible way to inform
the driver where to put binfo in the MTs, and have come with the following
aproach: smsc config directivs as follows

Case 1)
binfo-mt-param = 064
binfo-mt-pattern = %B 

Case 2)
binfo-mt-param = 023
binfo-mt-pattern = %p%B

Case 3)
binfo-mt-param = 023
binfo-mt-pattern = whateverprefix%p%Bwhateversuffix


And maybe if some has to use param 065 (service description) to put the
billing information

binfo-mt-param = 065
binfo-mt-pattern = %B

What do you thing about this approach? Anyone interested in seeing that
going into cvs?

With this kind of flexibility, a lot of users could use kannel
out-of-the-box with more cimd2 links.

Angel Fradejas
Mediafusión España, S.A.
[email protected]
www.mediafusion.es
Tel +34 91 252 32 00
Fax +34 91 252 59 69


> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] En 
> nombre de Dziugas Baltrunas
> Enviado el: martes 25 de noviembre de 2003 14:37
> Para: [email protected]
> Asunto: RE: Service description parameters in CIMD2
> 
> Hi list,
> 
> could also somebody report, are these features supported at 
> operator by
> default (i.e. every packet is appended with that 
> information), or it's up
> to the operator to "add" that feature (sure, according to 
> CIMD2 spec), for
> example, binfo, service center address, etc.
> 
> regards,
> Dziugas Baltrunas
> 
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Angel Fradejas wrote:
> 
> >
> > >> I'll work on it.  I've also made some patches for my own
> > >> needs, and need
> > >> to filter those out first.
> >
> > We're already working to add standard &binfo= capabilities 
> to the cimd2
> > driver. Maybe if you tell me what you we can take it into 
> consideration. For
> > example, we don't need to use param 065 in any way with our 
> operators, but
> > it seems you need it.
> >
> > >> I've also noticed that parameter 69 (which the CIMD spec says is
> > >> "Service Center Address") is not recognized by Kannel, and I keep
> > >> getting warnings about it.  I'll try to add this in the patch
> > >> I'll make.
> >
> > Current cvs kannel does not give any warning for param 069 
> (just ignores it
> > silently), I made a patch for that months ago that went into cvs.
> > What version are you using?
> >
> > Angel Fradejas
> > Mediafusión Espa?a, S.A.
> > [email protected]
> > www.mediafusion.es
> > Tel +34 91 252 32 00
> > Fax +34 91 252 59 69
> >
> >
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.