RE: Service description parameters in CIMD2

Indeed, kannel 1.3.1 outputs a warning every time it sees param 069. 
My advise: switch as soon as you can to CVS-version, as it is far more
stable than 1.3.1

And if you tell me the details of the values you'd have to pass to your
operator into params 064 and 065, maybe I can see if I can fit your needs
into our working patch.

Angel Fradejas
Mediafusión España, S.A.
[email protected]
www.mediafusion.es
Tel +34 91 252 32 00
Fax +34 91 252 59 69



> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: 'Rafael 'Dido' Sevilla' [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Enviado el: martes 25 de noviembre de 2003 16:18
> Para: Angel Fradejas; [email protected]
> Asunto: Re: Service description parameters in CIMD2
> 
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 01:25:35PM +0100, Angel Fradejas wrote:
> > We're already working to add standard &binfo= capabilities 
> to the cimd2
> > driver. Maybe if you tell me what you we can take it into 
> consideration. For
> > example, we don't need to use param 065 in any way with our 
> operators, but
> > it seems you need it.
> > 
> 
> Amen.  If this happens soon it could make life a lot easier for me in
> the near future.  Our provider uses the tariff class and service
> description parameters to do billing, and at the moment all 
> I've done is
> statically add the values of these parameters to every 
> message sent via
> kannel.  Later on, I'll need to change these parameters depending on
> what type of message is sent (operator logo, ringtones, etc)...
> 
> > >> I've also noticed that parameter 69 (which the CIMD spec says is
> > >> "Service Center Address") is not recognized by Kannel, and I keep
> > >> getting warnings about it.  I'll try to add this in the patch 
> > >> I'll make.
> > 
> > Current cvs kannel does not give any warning for param 069 
> (just ignores it
> > silently), I made a patch for that months ago that went into cvs.
> > What version are you using?
> 
> 1.3.1
>