RE: DCS bug ?

> 
> hmmm, sounds like our smppbox you are talking about?! ... you didn't
> steal it from us Paul, did you? ;))
> 

No, but it might've worked better if I did...

> Ok getting back serious. So this is a SMPP server (or at least) SMPP
> proxy, right?

Yes.

> ok, that's an argument that can hold. If we consider proxying an
> submit_sm PDU via a chain like this:
> 
>   [submit_sm] -> SMPP proxy -> [Msg] -> bearerbox -> [submit_sm] ->
> SMPP server
> 
> then I do agree to Paul that the data coding values should be
> transparently delivered to the submit_sm PDU that goes it's way out of
> bearerbox.

Yes, that's exactly the use case.

> 
> Is it possible that we miss some other SMPP specific fields that come
> into account while re-converting back again to submit_sm PDU?
> 

Nothing more that I can see (so far...)