Re: [PATCH] Binding HTTP clients calls to specific interface

Hi Slava,

just a question: your patch sets http-interface static for the whole process 
(http-interface). Would it make sense to set 'interface' for each http 
request (i.e. by calling http_start_request with wished interface) ? 

e.g. one application with 2 threads: first thread starts http request through 
eth0 and second thread through eth1. such is impossible with attached patch 
or I'm missing something?

On Thursday 18 December 2003 09:13, Vjacheslav Chekushin wrote:
> Hi, Alexander.
>
> I've included update to userguide.
> Could you check, is it enough?
>
> Alexander Malysh wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 December 2003 13:53, Vjacheslav Chekushin wrote:
> >>Hi, Alexander.
> >>
> >>The problem is that I haven't write access to CVS ;).
> >
> > oops, I thought you have write access...
> > would you please add new option to userguide and resend a whole patch. I
> > will commit it then.
> >
> > Thanks in advance...
> >
> >>Alexander Malysh wrote:
> >>>Hi Slava,
> >>>
> >>>as a known open-source-process , no votes/comments are equal to +0 , so
> >>>you as a one that have write access should just commit things, because
> >>>some time for review by others elapsed and no vetos are there.
> >>>
> >>>Only one comment from me: I'm +1 for this patch , but please add this
> >>> new config option to userguide. We _must_ keep userguide uptodate.
> >>>
> >>>On Tuesday 16 December 2003 13:00, Vjacheslav Chekushin wrote:

-- 
Best regards / Mit besten Grüßen aus Düsseldorf

Dipl.-Ing.
Alexander Malysh
___________________________________________

Centrium GmbH
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf

Fon: +49 (0211) 74 84 51 80
Fax: +49 (0211) 277 49 109

email: [email protected]
web: www.centrium.de
msn: [email protected]
icq: 98063111
___________________________________________

Please avoid sending me Word, Excel or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html