Re: [CFP] WAP 2.0 roadmap meeting (follow up, action items)

Remember that *all* server requirements are optional, so it is up to
us to define Kannel WAP 2.0 gateway. But I think 2.0 should at least
implement all services we have now. This means implementing at
least:

a) 2.0 Gateway
b) 2.0 PPG

Aarno

On 26.1.2004, at 13:07, Stipe Tolj wrote:

> ok, the last meeting did had some usefull outcome IMO. Let's get this
> good way continued. We'd like to see you all boarded again this friday
>
>   Fri 2004-01-30, 02:30pm (CET)
>   IRC freenode: #kannel
>
> to get some action items and fixed points for a TODO towards WAP 2.0
> compliance.
> Discussions in the list before the appointments are _highly_ welcome,
> so please do this too. The meeting is more of a way to have direct
> interaction with the developer entities.
>
> Stipe
>
> mailto:[email protected]
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Wapme Systems AG
>
> Münsterstr. 248
> 40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
>
> phone: +49.211.74845.0
> fax: +49.211.74845.299
>
> mailto:[email protected]
> http://www.wapme-systems.de/
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Cygwin)
>
> mIsEP6mcYwEEAMDnUiUwrbb+xwTFWN6TxF2+XZu7/alwJMeCwMBRvXtPZqfjpPhS
> OkBpU0F4TrVuugz1HINTSaJTYq10AzDQXp5NkyWgckqW79nPAWuOX0dicbJk+cN2
> nM2TI4KaxUDe6u8hghNEnH/i2lXsUu9apnP/iixzV81VC2je3uc9hZpnAAYptEVT
> dGlwZSBUb2xqIChUZWNobm9sb2d5IENlbnRlciAmIFJlc2VhcmNoIExhYikgPHRv
> bGpAd2FwbWUtc3lzdGVtcy5kZT6ItAQTAQIAHgUCP6mcYwIbAwYLCQgHAwIDFQID
> AxYCAQIeAQIXgAAKCRABV0w1BqPYRuSqA/wPzsQxao2YePENCtgRTrO86U6zg3sl
> OcS6CJFI4FZP5h/xD3GRsNH1+MPSvZlomDdpFnr547DGz/Kq9MXuQwVvlVig5yWZ
> K5dtKp1r5YLhxJQBhfirZbRFFnYmf19f18J8OoS28tuFVftDl1AIwJS3HLyBTv6H
> g2HyLAEKQIp30Q==
> =aYCI
> -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
>