Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?

Hi there!

On any developing process like these it’s a good idea to have a devel 
release more often, let's say every 1-2 months.Or we may have a 
situation where the differences are so many that make difficult to 
troubleshoot.
I’m currently using 1.3.1 and I’m really afraid to upgrade to 1.3.2 .

<j/>


Alexander Malysh wrote:

>Hello Bruno,
>
>1.3.2 should be good tested and remaining bug's should be fixed first before
>we can call it stable (IMO) and cvs version (before 1.3.2) was not tested
>by too much people, so we should wait a bit...
>
>P.S. why not package 1.3.2 for debian and get it more testing?
>
>Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Hello all.
>>
>>Does anyone have any complain about 1.3.2 in comparison with 1.2.1 ?
>>
>>What do you think about releasing 1.3.2 as 1.2.2 stable so I can package
>>it for Debian and we could have the "latest stable" version in Sarge ?
>>
>>Stipe ?
>>    
>>
>
>  
>