Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?

 > Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
 >
 >>Hello all.
 >>
 >>Does anyone have any complain about 1.3.2 in comparison with 1.2.1 ?
 >>
 >>What do you think about releasing 1.3.2 as 1.2.2 stable so I can package
 >>it for Debian and we could have the "latest stable" version in Sarge ?
 >>
 >>Stipe ?

Alexander Malysh wrote:
> Hello Bruno,
> 
> 1.3.2 should be good tested and remaining bug's should be fixed first before
> we can call it stable (IMO) and cvs version (before 1.3.2) was not tested
> by too much people, so we should wait a bit...
> 
> P.S. why not package 1.3.2 for debian and get it more testing?

Because I can't pack a development version for a "stable" Debian 
release, and I have to do it before August 13th. I'd prefer to have a 
more current version than to keep older 1.2.1 in to-be-released Sarge.

Rogelio, can you please send me/us a patch with what you've changed ?

Is there any other bug that would be a regression from 1.2.1 ?