Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Alexander Malysh <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bruno Rodrigues wrote: > > Bruno Rodrigues wrote: > > > >>Hello all. > >> > >>Does anyone have any complain about 1.3.2 in comparison with 1.2.1 ? > >> > >>What do you think about releasing 1.3.2 as 1.2.2 stable so I can > >>package it for Debian and we could have the "latest stable" version in > >>Sarge ? > >> > >>Stipe ? > > Alexander Malysh wrote: >> Hello Bruno, >> >> 1.3.2 should be good tested and remaining bug's should be fixed first >> before we can call it stable (IMO) and cvs version (before 1.3.2) was not >> tested by too much people, so we should wait a bit... >> >> P.S. why not package 1.3.2 for debian and get it more testing? > > Because I can't pack a development version for a "stable" Debian > release, and I have to do it before August 13th. I'd prefer to have a > more current version than to keep older 1.2.1 in to-be-released Sarge. > > Rogelio, can you please send me/us a patch with what you've changed ? > > Is there any other bug that would be a regression from 1.2.1 ? hmm, ok - understand... looking through bug reports, I don't see any showstopper to call 1.3.2 -> 1.2.2 (anyway 1.3.2 is more stable as 1.2.1), so I'm +1. btw. copyright in debian directory doesn't match kannel license... -- Thanks, Alex